18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

Poll Red Dot or Not on your CCW weapon?

Take a survey

Do you have (want to have) a red dot on your CCW pistol?


  • Total voters
    204
"Every gunfight is Open division and God is holding the timer" - Chuck Pressburg

any of my pistols that will be used for putting points in the board, competition or against somebody else, are all wearing red dots. I dabble in iron sights at matches academically, but pistol RDS provide such a huge advantage in any situation that I consider it almost mandatory in this day and age for defensive/duty- use.
 
"Every gunfight is Open division and God is holding the timer" - Chuck Pressburg

any of my pistols that will be used for putting points in the board, competition or against somebody else, are all wearing red dots. I dabble in iron sights at matches academically, but pistol RDS provide such a huge advantage in any situation that I consider it almost mandatory in this day and age for defensive/duty- use.
I'm still working at it. I've found during competition I'm still a little faster with the irons - but I have 30+ years experience with irons.
 
I'm still working at it. I've found during competition I'm still a little faster with the irons - but I have 30+ years experience with irons.

I grew up with irons, but at the end of that period, started learning about target focus instead of front sight focus from a Frank Proctor class. I switched to dots a couple years later and my eyes were already visually trained for how you're supposed to shoot dots.

I used the same index on presentation for red dot guns that I do with irons and the dot appears center window 99% of the time, excluding fouled draws. I switch back and forth between irons and red dot and can still shoot irons passably, but I am now much faster and accurate with optics. It's all dryfire!
 
While I like the idea of a sight on my ccw I have 2 reasons to go against it.

1) I want to keep my ccw as light weight as possible.
2) I have astigmatism and so far the dots show up double if not triple for me. And I've tried all three colors
Try the red with the black ring around it.
 
No - that’s why I said the odds are in favor of the red dot - it brings too many positives. All I’m saying is that how you set up your gun using some items (like a trigger or safety deletion) CAN give the prosecutor or plaintiffs attorney something to play with. (Like the AZ officer who had a questionable phrase on his AR dustcover).

In some counties, such as Alameda and Contra Costa - the county prohibits the use of lights and red dots on CCW guns. (Don’t ask me why - bad decisions based on bad theories…).

Maybe I wasn’t super clear on that - so I apologize. Red Dots are not necessarily a criminal issue - unless you miss and hit an innocent person due to being a bad shooter with a red dot and they’d have to prove that…. Civilly I suspect someone will try to make hay with it at some point but as long as the facts are good you should be good.
Seems the bigger issue would be using a dangerous and deadly off roster Glock not approved for civilian sales.
 
No - that’s why I said the odds are in favor of the red dot - it brings too many positives. All I’m saying is that how you set up your gun using some items (like a trigger or safety deletion) CAN give the prosecutor or plaintiffs attorney something to play with. (Like the AZ officer who had a questionable phrase on his AR dustcover).

In some counties, such as Alameda and Contra Costa - the county prohibits the use of lights and red dots on CCW guns. (Don’t ask me why - bad decisions based on bad theories…).

Maybe I wasn’t super clear on that - so I apologize. Red Dots are not necessarily a criminal issue - unless you miss and hit an innocent person due to being a bad shooter with a red dot and they’d have to prove that…. Civilly I suspect someone will try to make hay with it at some point but as long as the facts are good you should be good.
That’s why it’s FUD. There’s nothing to base that feeling off of. Sure if you write “eat 💩 and die” on the slide and put a punisher logo yeah that’s gonna look bad in court lmao.

You’re all focusing so much on stuff that barely matters when how and why the shooting happens is 99% of the legality
 
That’s why it’s FUD. There’s nothing to base that feeling off of. Sure if you write “eat 💩 and die” on the slide and put a punisher logo yeah that’s gonna look bad in court lmao.

You’re all focusing so much on stuff that barely matters when how and why the shooting happens is 99% of the legality
I think we agree. Red dots are a good thing. It’s the stupid stuff that will give the other side something to throw at the wall. (Red dots are not, or at least shouldn’t be one of those things.) Civilly I’ve seen cases go bad over peripheral stuff (not a red dot…), but civil court is kind of a different animal.
 
I think we agree. Red dots are a good thing. It’s the stupid stuff that will give the other side stuff to throw at the wall. Civilly I’ve seen cases go bad over peripheral stuff.
Like what? Link up the cases, it’s all public record.
 
Never shot the ACRO P-2 but it is not as massive so better for ccw. RCR has a much wider window, easier to see.

The Trijicon RCR features a noticeable blue tint on its glass, which comes from the signature polarizing notch filter Trijicon uses to maximize red dot brightness and battery efficiency. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Why the Blue Tint Exists
    • Notch Filter: The coating reflects specific wavelengths of light to make the 3.25 MOA red dot pop clearly against targets.
    • Sun Glare Reduction: Many users find that the darker hue helps cut down and manage bright sun glare outdoors.
    • Legacy Design: This blue-tinted signature is standard across many classic and modern Trijicon optics, such as the legacy RMR series. [1, 2, 3, 4]

Performance Impact
    • Clarity: While visible when looking through the optic, the tint does not hinder target acquisition during active use.
    • Comparison: Compared to competitors with completely clear glass like the Aimpoint ACRO P2, the Trijicon RCR exhibits a much stronger blue hue. [1]
My Lanta! For the cost of the red dot I can buy a new gun!
 
Like what? Link up the cases, it’s all public record.

I think it's most likely a prosecution tactic to sway the jury emotionally rather than a legal point of attack based on facts.

Any decent lawyer will point out that none of those cringe punisher or skull accessories which are strictly cosmetic are illegal nor do they make an otherwise legal shooting illegal. This line of logic is akin to saying the clothes you wear plays a role whether a shoot is a good shoot or a bad shoot.
 
Back
Top Bottom