18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

AB 1127 Glock ban



Search Assist

“When a California bill passes out of the suspense file, it means that the Appropriations Committee has decided to move the bill forward for further consideration and debate in the full Senate or Assembly. This process typically occurs during a specific hearing known as "suspense day," where bills with significant fiscal impacts are reviewed and either advanced or held back.”
 
Do we know what other pistols will be impacted with this ban?
…any semiautomatic pistol with a cruciform trigger bar that can be readily converted by hand or with common household tools into a machinegun by the installation or attachment of a pistol converter, as specified, and “pistol converter” as any device or instrument that, when installed in or attached to the rear of the slide of a semiautomatic pistol, replaces the backplate and interferes with the trigger mechanism and thereby enables the pistol to shoot automatically more than one shot by a single function of the trigger.
Head of the class is Glock. As the Senate Legislative Analyst’s Office pointed out:
IMG_0840.jpegIMG_0841.jpeg
The B&L case contains 9 CA language which prohibits this specific type of prohibition.
 
Last edited:
Has the legislature stepped in and EXEMPTED individual law enforcement officers yet?
Yes, senate amended section 27595 with
"This section shall not apply to any of the following:
....
(9) The sale of a machinegun-convertible pistol to an individual who is an active peace officer described in Section 830.1 or a reserve peace officer described in Section 830.6 who is employed or appointed by a law enforcement agency described in Section 830.1 and is authorized to carry a firearm on duty."

see blue highlighted text.
 
It’s an Assembly Bill currently in the Senate referred to 2d reading on the Floor.
After reading it will progress to 3rd reading on the Senate Floor which will allow Floor Debate.
If passed it will return to the Assembly Floor for concurrence with amendments.
Passing that, it will be engrossed and then enrolled to the Governor for consideration.
 
It's already been pointed out on another thread it only effect's Glocks that have a certain feature.
Glocks were the original, specified target (Please see post five above this.) However, the provisions of the bill focus on the “cruciform” fire control structure which may also be in use with other weapons.
…any semiautomatic pistol with a cruciform trigger bar that can be readily converted by hand or with common household tools into a machinegun by the installation or attachment of a pistol converter,
But, Glock is the target for “Glock switches”.
 
Last edited:
It’s an Assembly Bill currently in the Senate referred to 2d reading on the Floor.
After reading it will progress to 3rd reading on the Senate Floor which will allow Floor Debate.
If passed it will return to the Assembly Floor for concurrence with amendments.
Passing that, it will be engrossed and then enrolled to the Governor for consideration.
Isn't it funny even after all these twist and turns, back and forth between both chambers and second third readings, these anti gun bills Always pass swiftly.
 
Glocks were the original, specified target. However, the provisions of the bill focus on the “cruciform” fire control structure which may also be in use with other weapons.

But, Glock is the target for “Glock switches”.

The Shadow Systems guns may also come under scrutiny, but not much else. This may depend if its doable with the following tools. I assume it'll be up to the State OAG. As written, I don't think the gen 5 Glocks - were they to come to CA - would avoid this ban.

CCR Title 11, § 4082 (d) "Common household tools" means screwdrivers, pipe wrenches, vice grip pliers, other pliers, hacksaws, crowbars, electric/cordless drills, hammers, chisels, and crescent wrenches.
 
Isn't it funny even after all these twist and turns, back and forth between both chambers and second third readings, these anti gun bills Always pass swiftly.
This bill has gone through the same procedural hurdles usually required of all bills (exceptions can and do exist). But for this bill to move with limited restrictions through both houses isn’t surprising. The Legislature holds a supermajority in both houses and gun control is essential to Newsom’s political image. It isn’t “funny” (read odd) that these bills pass swiftly…many other subjects move with the same speed, or faster (see the redistricting actions).
 
Wet dream for the state would be for this to pass, go into law, remove all glocks, shadow systems, and that new derya clone.

Then the state wins the microstamping roster case (currently an injunction) and they drop all guns with an asterisk.

One, two punch KO to us in California.
 
On 2 Sep, the bill passed 2d reading in the Senate and was ordered to 3d reading.
Although it could appear on file for 3d reading this week, it probably won’t be on the file until next week.
 
When’s Newsom expected to sign this?
Last day to sign or veto bills in the Gov’s possession by 12 Sep is 12 Oct.

It will take a while to collect all the anti-gun bills and schedule a public signing with the usual suspects (Everytown; Moms Demand, etc.). This will be the showcase because it will ban machine guns.
 
Last edited:
When’s Newsom expected to sign this?
hell yes he's going to sign it, bro! He can't WAIT to sign it
(he just has to let his executive PR team run it by his Executive Executive marketing team for analysis first)
or he does nada and it rolls into law i think
either way he's a turd
 
Re: AB 1127, the Glock machine gun ban.

Haven’t had time to chew on this but, the bill got a major amendment just prior to being approved by the legislature.

It appears that the amendment gives Glock (or manufacturers of crucifix firing system pistols) until July 1, 2026, (six months following its effective date of 1/1/26) to redesign older generation models to prevent illegal modification with machinegun conversion devices. If this is done, the older modified gens (read Gen 3) would be grandfathered onto the roster without the need for the “Safe Handgun” attributes (CLI, mag disconnect, etc).

Newer generation 4 and 5 Glocks, which are far more common in other states, appear to still be excluded from the roster.

Here’s the final amended version showing the changes in blue.

ETA: The “firearm accessory” language is concerning as well as the concept of “reasonable controls”. The first is far too broad and the second is far too ambiguous.

But this looks like a deal to allow Newsom to ban machine guns while showing his support of the 2A and firearms industry efforts to provide common sense solutions (I hated writing that).
 
Last edited:
Re: AB 1127, the Glock machine gun ban.

Haven’t had time to chew on this but, the bill got a major amendment just prior to being approved by the legislature.

It appears that the amendment gives Glock (or manufacturers of crucifix firing system pistols) until July 1, 2026, (six months following its effective date of 1/1/26) to redesign older generation models to prevent illegal modification with machinegun conversion devices. If this is done, the older modified gens (read Gen 3) would be grandfathered onto the roster without the need for the “Safe Handgun” attributes (CLI, mag disconnect, etc).

Newer generation 4 and 5 Glocks, which are far more common in other states, appear to still be excluded from the roster.

Here’s the final amended version showing the changes in blue.

E4TA: The “firearm accessory” language is concerning as well as the concept of “reasonable controls”. The first is far too broad and the second is far too ambiguous.

But this looks like a deal to allow Newsom to ban machine guns while showing his support of the 2A and firearms industry efforts to provide common sense solutions (I hated writing that).
Yes very clever!
 
ironically the gen 5s can't take a glock switch without modifying the slide substantially, I wonder if they could just put gen 5s on the roster since it's already a literal redesign that won't take a glock switch.
 
Back
Top Bottom