- Messages
- 329
- Classified ads
- 1
Do we know what other pistols will be impacted with this ban?
By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.
Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.
Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.
Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.
Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.
A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.
New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.
Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!
Do we know what other pistols will be impacted with this ban?
Head of the class is Glock. As the Senate Legislative Analyst’s Office pointed out:…any semiautomatic pistol with a cruciform trigger bar that can be readily converted by hand or with common household tools into a machinegun by the installation or attachment of a pistol converter, as specified, and “pistol converter” as any device or instrument that, when installed in or attached to the rear of the slide of a semiautomatic pistol, replaces the backplate and interferes with the trigger mechanism and thereby enables the pistol to shoot automatically more than one shot by a single function of the trigger.


Yes, senate amended section 27595 withHas the legislature stepped in and EXEMPTED individual law enforcement officers yet?
Glocks were the original, specified target (Please see post five above this.) However, the provisions of the bill focus on the “cruciform” fire control structure which may also be in use with other weapons.It's already been pointed out on another thread it only effect's Glocks that have a certain feature.
But, Glock is the target for “Glock switches”.…any semiautomatic pistol with a cruciform trigger bar that can be readily converted by hand or with common household tools into a machinegun by the installation or attachment of a pistol converter,
Isn't it funny even after all these twist and turns, back and forth between both chambers and second third readings, these anti gun bills Always pass swiftly.It’s an Assembly Bill currently in the Senate referred to 2d reading on the Floor.
After reading it will progress to 3rd reading on the Senate Floor which will allow Floor Debate.
If passed it will return to the Assembly Floor for concurrence with amendments.
Passing that, it will be engrossed and then enrolled to the Governor for consideration.
Glocks were the original, specified target. However, the provisions of the bill focus on the “cruciform” fire control structure which may also be in use with other weapons.
But, Glock is the target for “Glock switches”.
This bill has gone through the same procedural hurdles usually required of all bills (exceptions can and do exist). But for this bill to move with limited restrictions through both houses isn’t surprising. The Legislature holds a supermajority in both houses and gun control is essential to Newsom’s political image. It isn’t “funny” (read odd) that these bills pass swiftly…many other subjects move with the same speed, or faster (see the redistricting actions).Isn't it funny even after all these twist and turns, back and forth between both chambers and second third readings, these anti gun bills Always pass swiftly.
When’s Newsom expected to sign this?
hell yes he's going to sign it, bro! He can't WAIT to sign itWhen’s Newsom expected to sign this?
Yes very clever!Re: AB 1127, the Glock machine gun ban.
Haven’t had time to chew on this but, the bill got a major amendment just prior to being approved by the legislature.
It appears that the amendment gives Glock (or manufacturers of crucifix firing system pistols) until July 1, 2026, (six months following its effective date of 1/1/26) to redesign older generation models to prevent illegal modification with machinegun conversion devices. If this is done, the older modified gens (read Gen 3) would be grandfathered onto the roster without the need for the “Safe Handgun” attributes (CLI, mag disconnect, etc).
Newer generation 4 and 5 Glocks, which are far more common in other states, appear to still be excluded from the roster.
Here’s the final amended version showing the changes in blue.
E4TA: The “firearm accessory” language is concerning as well as the concept of “reasonable controls”. The first is far too broad and the second is far too ambiguous.
But this looks like a deal to allow Newsom to ban machine guns while showing his support of the 2A and firearms industry efforts to provide common sense solutions (I hated writing that).
Looks like it was presented to the governor at 3:00 p.m. on the 24th. So he's probably got until the 24th of October.Last day to sign or veto bills in the Gov’s possession by 12 Sep is 12 Oct.
Welcome to CAguns.net!
Hello There! I see you're browsing as a guest. Sign up to use our regional search features and communicate with other members.
Registering is quick and free. Once registered, you’ll unlock exclusive features available only to members. Join today!
If you choose to become a contributor, you'll get even more advanced features.📸 We're now on Instagram! Follow us @caguns_net and tag us in your videos and photos to get featured!