I understand how and why they work, of course, with flatter shooting, possibly improved recoil control, faster follow up, etc.
What concerns me is that self defense may not be under ideal circumstances, where the pistol is held extended and away from the body and in an open area. In situations where one is engaged with an assailant at close range (or point blank), is the compensator actually a detriment? Having gasses expelled upwards might injure the user. Especially since eye and ear protection will not likely be worn in a self defense situation.
Or when in a car, for example, the compensator may again be a problem.
I see that there are advantages, but they don’t seem to overcome the problems when it comes to CCW for me. Am I missing some additional facts that might tip the balance?
For a range or competition gun, the advantages are obvious. But for a micro 9 for CCW, i feel like compensators present as many problems as advantages. They just look great and are fun to have on pistols that are otherwise snappy.
What concerns me is that self defense may not be under ideal circumstances, where the pistol is held extended and away from the body and in an open area. In situations where one is engaged with an assailant at close range (or point blank), is the compensator actually a detriment? Having gasses expelled upwards might injure the user. Especially since eye and ear protection will not likely be worn in a self defense situation.
Or when in a car, for example, the compensator may again be a problem.
I see that there are advantages, but they don’t seem to overcome the problems when it comes to CCW for me. Am I missing some additional facts that might tip the balance?
For a range or competition gun, the advantages are obvious. But for a micro 9 for CCW, i feel like compensators present as many problems as advantages. They just look great and are fun to have on pistols that are otherwise snappy.