18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

Sig Sauer P322 on roster

Mediocre piece of crap.

Their QC standard for that pistol is that if it does 4 rounds in a string out of 10 that it is good to go.
What's up with QC with Sig lately? Is it just P320 or all across the product lines wth poor QC?
I remember reading that for M9 pistol trial, Sig P226 actually outperformed Beretta 92 and only lost due to price point.
 
That video is of a p320. This thread is about the p322. Why is it relevant?

My p322 is awesome. 

I have 2000 rounds through it. A handful light primer strikes. Probably due to 10+ year old ammo. Second strike no problem.

No real issues so far. Leaps and bounds better than my mosquito or my AA glock 17 conversion.

I put a romeo zero on it and it runs fine. The optic sucks, but works fine for a rimfire gun.
 
That video is of a p320. This thread is about the p322. Why is it relevant?

My p322 is awesome. 

I have 2000 rounds through it. A handful light primer strikes. Probably due to 10+ year old ammo. Second strike no problem.

No real issues so far. Leaps and bounds better than my mosquito or my AA glock 17 conversion.

I put a romeo zero on it and it runs fine. The optic sucks, but works fine for a rimfire gun.

Relevant two aspects.

If this guy is not full of it ( does not look like it) then Sig likely to be be sued into oblivion. So you may end up owning piece of history.

Even if Sig survives the way they handle this mess so far is less than inspiring. I am not convinced they deserve support of firearm community.

P322 may be decent gun I have no opinion on the matter. Bit I do have an opinion on the company who did not throw every single tester at apparent problem of such magnitude. Some guy in garage finds this and not Sig QA?
What is up with that?
 
Mediocre piece of crap.

Their QC standard for that pistol is that if it does 4 rounds in a string out of 10 that it is good to go.
You shoot one? I've only messed with the non-roster version, but it was super fun and very reliable after a few hundred rounds. Sig sucks, but this gun is a hit. Much better than the G44 (which is also pretty damn fun).
 
Relevant two aspects.

If this guy is not full of it ( does not look like it) then Sig likely to be be sued into oblivion. So you may end up owning piece of history.

Even if Sig survives the way they handle this mess so far is less than inspiring. I am not convinced they deserve support of firearm community.

P322 may be decent gun I have no opinion on the matter. Bit I do have an opinion on the company who did not throw every single tester at apparent problem of such magnitude. Some guy in garage finds this and not Sig QA?
What is up with that?
Well that would be a great debate in one of the numerous p320 threads.
 
You shoot one? I've only messed with the non-roster version, but it was super fun and very reliable after a few hundred rounds. Sig sucks, but this gun is a hit. Much better than the G44 (which is also pretty damn fun).
I am here in NH. If I want to deal with a mediocre piece of crap I can roll down the road and grab one. Otherwise I like my customers enough to not subject them to that level of BS
 
Mediocre piece of crap.

Their QC standard for that pistol is that if it does 4 rounds in a string out of 10 that it is good to go.
Sounds like you got a bad one. That's a bummer.

There's definitely many videos out there of early p322 (pre california roster) that are mediocre pieces of crap.

Typical sig to use the consumer as a beta tester.

Glad I got a good one, and I'm looking forward to hearing from other california p322 owners as to how theirs are running.
 
I am here in NH. If I want to deal with a mediocre piece of crap I can roll down the road and grab one. Otherwise I like my customers enough to not subject them to that level of BS
Being in california, we don't have a plethora of options like free states. This is one of the few similar in features and size to a full sized duty gun/ccw gun. So it is noteworthy for us stuck with a roster.
 
Well that would be a great debate in one of the numerous p320 threads.
And I do not disagree with you in theory. If we would all would be robots that are do not include any emotional component in our discussion that discussion of Sig 322 would not bring any mention of Sig 320.
But we are who we are. Assuming that Sig survives this at all any Sig related post will be replied with "but Sig P320". it is just a reality.
 
Sounds like you got a bad one. That's a bummer.

There's definitely many videos out there of early p322 (pre california roster) that are mediocre pieces of crap.

Typical sig to use the consumer as a beta tester.

Glad I got a good one, and I'm looking forward to hearing from other california p322 owners as to how theirs are running.
I have a P322 and it’s very reliable. I was at the range this past weekend and put 200 rounds through it and had 3 fail to fire which may have been ammo related. I’m very happy with it and super fun to shoot. It got fouled up but it was still running strong. I’m curious how many more rounds it could’ve taken before the fouling caused more failures.
 
It’s the mag disconnect safety that binds on the mags and doesn’t allow them to drop freely. Not advocating that anyone intentionally remove a safety feature, but if you happen to fully disassemble the gun for a thorough cleaning and that mag disconnect safety falls off the work bench in the process, then that would solve the mag drop issue.
From what I read online, that the mag disconnect also prevents aftermarket triggers such as the tandem kross?
 
I have a P322 and it’s very reliable. I was at the range this past weekend and put 200 rounds through it and had 3 fail to fire which may have been ammo related. I’m very happy with it and super fun to shoot. It got fouled up but it was still running strong. I’m curious how many more rounds it could’ve taken before the fouling caused more failures.
I wonder if companies will come out with aftermarket enhanced s7 steel firing pins in the future; similar to the walther p22?
 
Back
Top Bottom