18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

Legal SB-704 Firearms: firearm barrels - It's been passed by committee.......

Is it?
WT_? Tangent much? Let's get real and talk about ignoring habeas corpus, infringing upon the first amendment, denial of due process, extrajudicial arrest, detention and even deportation of legal residents, etc, etc, etc. The list is quite long and quite varied but what you focus on is sports? Please, the coffee is brewing the bacon and eggs are on the grill, wake up and acknowledge that breakfast is cooking and not in a good way!
Dyea, get real, and talk about your party. Democrats as a whole has been infringing on everyone's rights. Isn't jailing Jan 6th participants for years without trial for that one day of protest while allowing nationwide rioters off with a slap on wrist. Start here, and work yourself forward to today on the "accomplishments" of the Democrat party.
 
Ikeo1 is an honest man of integrity and rest assured he has slapped my wrist once or twice as well. I have no idea what DU is, but maybe take some responsibility for being banned because you crossed a line or two or three?

Edit: There is no call for you to impugn Ikeo1 because you F-ed-up on reddit.
What I am implying is maybe there is a connect between them as my ban timing almost seemed like reaction timing.

I got banned for speaking as I saw it. He lets others to call me names, and when I am on defensive, bans me. Hey, he could of been fair and banned all that went hard off topic including me, but to single me out? Lol. Whatever.
 
This seems to imply Walz is not pro Second Amendment. Am I missing something you want to add to support your claim?


It is kind of hard to care about Democrats rights being trampled when they are okay with my rights being trampled. I would love to care about them all, but here we are.
Walz is pro 2nd. However, he is rational. Pro 2nd doesn't mean you're in favor of bump stocks, forced reset triggers, 40mm grenade launchers, fully automatic weapons and leaving weapons in the hands of people who present an immediate threat to public safety. Walz is intelligent and thoughtful and is interested in the welfare of all citizens in his state, IMHO. Most importantly, he is anti-authoritarian. I would point out that Trump is 100% in favor of taking weapons away from people without due process, if you need a citation, let me know.

A recent quote from Walz really cinched it for me.

“The Road to Authoritarianism is Littered with People Telling You You're Overreacting”
- Tim Walz, Governor of Minnesota.
 
Walz is pro 2nd. However, he is rational. Pro 2nd doesn't mean you're in favor of bump stocks, forced reset triggers, 40mm grenade launchers, fully automatic weapons and leaving weapons in the hands of people who present an immediate threat to public safety. Walz is intelligent and thoughtful and is interested in the welfare of all citizens in his state, IMHO. Most importantly, he is anti-authoritarian. I would point out that Trump is 100% in favor of taking weapons away from people without due process, if you need a citation, let me know.

A recent quote from Walz really cinched it for me.

“The Road to Authoritarianism is Littered with People Telling You You're Overreacting”
- Tim Walz, Governor of Minnesota.
Tim Walz has said there's no guarantee to free speech
 
Walz is pro 2nd. However, he is rational. Pro 2nd doesn't mean you're in favor of bump stocks, forced reset triggers, 40mm grenade launchers, fully automatic weapons and leaving weapons in the hands of people who present an immediate threat to public safety. Walz is intelligent and thoughtful and is interested in the welfare of all citizens in his state, IMHO. Most importantly, he is anti-authoritarian. I would point out that Trump is 100% in favor of taking weapons away from people without due process, if you need a citation, let me know.

A recent quote from Walz really cinched it for me.

“The Road to Authoritarianism is Littered with People Telling You You're Overreacting”
- Tim Walz, Governor of Minnesota.
You talk about protecting rights then immediately talk about infringing upon liberty. I notice you posted nothing about Walz actual Second Amendment stance like I did that clearly shows he is not pro Second Amendment. The road to authoritarianism is littered with Democrats' anti-civil rights platform towards firearms. Including statements that I don't need whatever it is you think is bad.

And this is why California is screwed. Too many FUDs who think they are pro-gun, but they are anything but.
 
You talk about protecting rights then immediately talk about infringing upon liberty. I notice you posted nothing about Walz actual Second Amendment stance like I did that clearly shows he is not pro Second Amendment. The road to authoritarianism is littered with Democrats' anti-civil rights platform towards firearms. Including statements that I don't need whatever it is you think is bad.

And this is why California is screwed. Too many FUDs who think they are pro-gun, but they are anything but.
No idea what a "FUD" is, please define?

Here is an article about Walz perspective on firearms, I consider it to be well balanced and quite sane.

 
Here is an article about Walz perspective on firearms, I consider it to be well balanced and quite sane.

That article did not say much about his perspective. He is pro-assault weapons ban which means he is not pro Second Amendment.

See here is the problem. There is never enough gun control. Walz definitely bragged about instituting universal background checks. Yet, there is never compromise. If they are going to institute this, they should give something back. Okay you can pass a background check? So then they should let you have whatever you want.

Except you do not even agree with that and you think there should be more limits on your liberty because you don't think something is useful, practical, or is too scary. In California, there is zero compromise. Just take, take, take. No need for me to go over the litany of anti-civil rights prohibitions in this state and here we are facing even more this year. It never ends.

FUD stands for fear, uncertainty, and doubt. You are currently spreading FUD about Tim Walz record. He might have been pro-gun when he was a congressman, but he is no longer pro gun or even pro Second Amendment. You might also be a Fudd. A guy who says he is pro-gun, but is anything but.

You are a California gun owner. Stay here. Do not go out and infect the rest of the nation. Free Americans need to stay free. We will just accept you for what you are. A FUD/D.
 
Back
Top Bottom