18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

If RAWs were transferable, what do you think sellers would charge?

How much would transferable RAWs sell for

  • About + $1k, just like AR pistol lowers

  • + $5k like post may samples

  • + $10k supply and demand

  • + $20k

  • + $30-50k just like transferables


Results are only viewable after voting.
do you have examples of P211 GTO's being seized? That was what I was asking.
I don't have a personal knowledge of that.
Keep in mind for CADOJ to seize something it needs to be in your inventory at the time of your audit and you need to be lacking a permit that would exempt you from having them.

In most cases during the audit they will see guns sold that may of not been legal and go from there.
 
Things cost and are worth more in California it just doesn't seem that a raw being transferable would make any sense like pre 86 today. It’s a complete waste of money. Those that were able to cash out on those are lucky and smart. They’re cool though especially the obscure and ww2 stuff.

When gunguytv had the retired agent on and he said best thing is to seperate a upper from lower. It was literally a relief from anxiety and always having to keep up with the constant compliance changes.
Even if having to be stored this way or added compliance. Prices always go up so if you eventually move they might be 3-5 times more expensive then if you wait to buy. Sometimes the reverse no one cares about that stuff anymore. Always better to buy reverse of trends anyway and sell if uou want when trending this goes for anything. For occasional trips or eventual move I think disassembled, compliant build, or compliant factory option is still best.
There is no prestige to raw arguably for pre 86 either. I don’t see younger generations unable to afford. I see it as no interest or money spent on life experiences vs hobbies. No real benefit more red tape for both.
 
No it's just internet fud for now, there is even one for sale here
The 211 GTO defiantly meet the definition of an AW.
There are a few Atlas Erebus that are also threaded barrels and 100% illegal. People are just banking on FFL's not knowing the platform or in the cases I see they only come in to PPT the frame and hand over the slide/barrel in the parking lot.

In the CALGUNS.net days all those posts would of been removed but here they just allow it. I know Ikeo has said they have removed some or make them put a disclaimer that the firearm is "unassembled" but new ones are posted weekly.

I've also seen banned by name AR's listed. Being posted in classified does not make it legal.
 
Last edited:
What's the punishment for making an assault weapon more assaulty by removing the BB?
 
What's the punishment for making an assault weapon more assaulty by removing the BB?
Possession of registered assault weapons are exempt of PC30605 charges via PC30680.
An officer would need to find some other law to arrest on that fails the protections in PC30680 and PC30605 in order to arrest you.
 
Possession of registered assault weapons are exempt of PC30605 charges via PC30680.
An officer would need to find some other law to arrest on that fails the protections in PC30680 and PC30605 in order to arrest you.
Oh hell yeah
 
Back
Top Bottom