18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

What's new
caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

DUNCAN V. BONTA GOES TO SCOTUS CONFERENCE - California Large Capacity Magazine Prohibition

NotARobotYet said:
Right, but there is a big difference between banning certain guns / NFA items and banning all guns broadly. You can absolutely buy guns in California. That was the point I was making.
Click to expand...
You're the guy that gives them inches. Glocks, Shadow systems. Now that they and possibly ruger caved its only gonna make it easier to go for the EYarefifteen death ray guns.
 
ShootFirstFirster said:
You're the guy that gives them inches. Glocks, Shadow systems. Now that they and possibly ruger caved its only gonna make it easier to go for the EYarefifteen death ray guns.
Click to expand...
I’m the guy saying inches need to be given on both sides. There is a happy medium. You may never be happy with it, but you’re not happy with what you have now either.
 
Hit Factor said:
Two things came to mind when I just read this little admonishment. The first was Aldous Huxley‘s Brave New World. And that is considered a dystopian novel for a reason.

The second was this:

View attachment 111490

Ban me if you must, but I’m with the guys on the right.
Click to expand...
I think that most of the people here are with " The guys on the right".

For the record, my ancestors were "the guys on the right".
 
governmentsucks1776 said:
Look up what a facists means. I could never say anything that other than their accepted narrative because they would attack me. Tell them that no man can be woman or that there are only 2 genders and see how accepting those "anti facist" really are. I agree, trump has been somewhat of a disappointment. Too lukewarm for someone who is not up for reelection. Trump is definitely not a conservative im hoping Vance will better. Also call out Gavin Kamela and everyone else that is anti gun and 💩s on the constitution who are corrupt. Let us have some integrity on both sides.
Click to expand...
Libertarians in 2025 are really like if you change the name ATF to ICE I’ll double their pay and completely ignore all historical precedence for civil liberties so long as the Feds narrative includes race based motives. Please daddy Trump give me the greatest surveillance state and social credit systems the world has ever seen in the name of constitutional liberty! 🗽
 
GoldensRule said:
Why does that matter? The only conclusion I can draw from the data is that stricter gun laws result in fewer deaths by guns. What other conclusions can you draw from the data?
Click to expand...
We can draw conclusions from all sorts of data, where restricting freedoms would lower deaths.

Force people to cut unhealthy foods by 50%. You'd save 400,000 lives.
Make abortions less permissive, cut abortions by 50%. You'd save 500,000 lives.
Restrict freedom of travel, cut miles driven by cars by half. You'd save 20,000 lives.
Ban suicides. You'd save 50,000 lives.
Ban drug overdoses. You'd save 100,000 lives.

There can be only one conclusion. Freedom is paid with blood. Worth it? Hell yeah!
 
grandpapeepap said:
I said why, how people off themselves shouldnt restrict my rights. Also can you show me the stats of homicide per 100k of wyoming vs california.
Click to expand...
Texas has a 40% higher homicide rate than Ca. Doesn't make sense to compare urban to non urban but Texas and California are the two most populous states.
 
couragewolf said:
Libertarians in 2025 are really like if you change the name ATF to ICE I’ll double their pay and completely ignore all historical precedence for civil liberties so long as the Feds narrative includes race based motives. Please daddy Trump give me the greatest surveillance state and social credit systems the world has ever seen in the name of constitutional liberty! 🗽
Click to expand...
😆 🤣 why are you dancing around what i said. Why dont you answer. Muster more "courage" wolf. The alleged antifacists are facist who want the power. Thats why they act the way they do. Not because they love democracy.
 
Deleted member 16735 said:
Texas has a 40% higher homicide rate than Ca. Doesn't make sense to compare urban to non urban but Texas and California are the two most populous states.
Click to expand...
FBI data from 2022 shows 5.7 vs 6.7 for california and texas per 100k for homicides. If you want CDC for gun homicide rate its 4.7 for 6.6 for the same but from 2021. And violent crime has been going down. They are the ones who brought up lax gun laws so I used wyoming to show the homicides with guns are low in a lax state its not an item issue.
 
Can we have a section where we just focus on the court case and outcomes, next steps of these cases vs a long prolonged motherless 🐐fest about all that is nuts?? I like following these court cases and informed input on what it means and next legal steps, etc, but it is tedious to try and read through pages of people spouting off and arguing.
 
TheAverageShooter said:
Can we have a section where we just focus on the court case and outcomes, next steps of these cases vs a long prolonged motherless 🐐fest about all that is nuts?? I like following these court cases and informed input on what it means and next legal steps, etc, but it is tedious to try and read through pages of people spouting off and arguing.
Click to expand...
Yeah its called read the case briefs and or watch the recording 😆 🤣 😂. Im joking 🙃 dont get offended
 
TheAverageShooter said:
Can we have a section where we just focus on the court case and outcomes, next steps of these cases vs a long prolonged motherless 🐐fest about all that is nuts?? I like following these court cases and informed input on what it means and next legal steps, etc, but it is tedious to try and read through pages of people spouting off and arguing.
Click to expand...
People who want to take ownership of a case are encouraged to create a Resource This will keep updates separates from discussion...

If there are any volunteers we can work with one or two people on a pilot for it.
 
governmentsucks1776 said:
😆 🤣 why are you dancing around what i said. Why dont you answer. Muster more "courage" wolf. The alleged antifacists are facist who want the power. Thats why they act the way they do. Not because they love democracy.
Click to expand...
Ah I remember that part of the constitution that says you don’t need a warrant if they have scary ideas
 
Please make sure to keep things civil. I just had to remove and report a post that doesn't follow community guidelines. If the user ends up reading it here, please post it to X and not here. This isn't the place for political manifestos.

We don't want things to get carried away here. This site for the benefit of Californian's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom