18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

What's new
caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

WBT GUNS- The best selection of CA legal Firearms

Poll Do you have CCW insurance? / What do you use?

Take a survey

What CCW insurance do you use?

  • None

    Votes: 27 22.0%

  • USCCA

    Votes: 15 12.2%

  • CCW Safe

    Votes: 34 27.6%

  • Attorneys On Retainer

    Votes: 30 24.4%

  • Firearms Legal Protection

    Votes: 6 4.9%

  • Right to Bear

    Votes: 6 4.9%

  • Second Call Defense

    Votes: 1 0.8%

  • US Law Shield

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Other

    Votes: 4 3.3%
  • Total voters
    123
Bobalover209 said:
Probably no harm in getting both of you can afford it. It would likely double your cost though, and may end up being redundant. For me CCW Safe pretty much covers everything I need once I added the civil liability.

We have to remember that hopefully it's something we will never have to use, and the vast majority CCW holders probably never do. It's to cover us from potential financial ruin in the slim chance it happens. Spending double on a redundant "insurance/attorney group" doesn't make sense for my situation.
Click to expand...
Thank you! Makes sense.
 
NorCalBusa said:
I missed it- when did ANY of these PrePaid Legal Expense houses become "insurance", registered in/for/with the state in which they sell??
Click to expand...
Some of them are organized that way like USCCA and the bear one. CCWSafe and AOR type plans are memberships not insurance products
 
Hi all, this seems like a good time to share an update on my CCW legal program, Carry California. Currently, there are about 20 pledges, which is insufficient to make it worth it for my law firm. I have the bandwidth to handle the plan, it's just been difficult from a sales perspective because I don't have a marketing department and this is not being advertised at all. I probably need 30-40 members to justify it. If anyone would like to be added to the interest list/pledge list, please email me at andrew@watters.law. Thanks.
 
I'm currently signed up with Firearms Legal Protection. Our company is currently partnered with them for a special referral rate, but I'm just using the same scan code that we hand out to customers.

 
EliteArmoryCV said:
I'm currently signed up with Firearms Legal Protection. Our company is currently partnered with them for a special referral rate, but I'm just using the same scan code that we hand out to customers.

Click to expand...
They do not cover CCW usage in a “sensitive place” correct?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom