18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

Baird v Bonta is out................

Nobody should strap on their AR and go to safeway to test it out. It looks like they upheld the requirement for an open carry permit so I guess the state is going to have to start issuing those? Probably still a lot to figure out.
 
Nobody should strap on their AR and go to safeway to test it out. It looks like they upheld the requirement for an open carry permit so I guess the state is going to have to start issuing those? Probably still a lot to figure out.

Somebody will for sure. The lure to get views on the internet is stronger than common sense.
 
Can the mandate be issued while the state has filed for appeal… ALSO both Baird and the AG have requested a rehearing
 
Can the mandate be issued while the state has filed for appeal… ALSO both Baird and the AG have requested a rehearing
No - Please refer to FRAP Rule 41.

Please note that the state has not filed for appeal. The state has requested a rehearing. There is only one appeal in the whole legal system and it is over. A "rehearing" is different from an "appeal." A "rehearing" is much larger in scope. An "appeal" only addresses narrow and specific claims of error. A "rehearing" is a complete "do-over." If any party seeks to raise the case to the Supreme Court, that is also not an "appeal." The Supreme Court conducts "reviews" of Circuit Court decisions. The scope of a "review" is similarly much larger than the scope of an appeal.
 
Back
Top Bottom