18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

Resource icon

A nice graphic history of CA gun laws

Librarian

Retired poltergeist - that's what I tell the IRS
CAguns Supporter
📝 Contributor
Messages
264
Quite a few things missing and not quite right. For instance, BFSC started 1994, and the next iteration HSC wasn't administered by "local law enforcement".

ETA
Re: The laws enacted in 1923, this link (upper left corner) is an editorial about how it was modeled after Kansas law to "forestall the flood of fanatical legislation" to deprive people of their 2A rights. There's more on Arthur Capper but I'll have to dig it up again.
 
Last edited:
Contrast with my out of date page http://web.archive.org/web/20191018...p?title=Time_Line_of_California_Firearms_Laws

Sadly, there have been additions to the corpus of ridiculous laws since 2015, most notably 2016's Proposition 63 - the wiki page is a 'good enough' summary, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_California_Proposition_63. That was my 'I cannot stay in CA' moment. Moved to Oregon in 2019.

The Ballotpedia page is similar, with somewhat better lawsuit coverage, I think - https://ballotpedia.org/California_...Large-Capacity_Ammunition_Magazine_Ban_(2016)

Being text-oriented, as are wikis, it would never have occurred to me to attempt such a picture. I do think the context of the criminal occurrences stimulating the Legislature is a useful addition.
 
Its missing 50bmg ban from Junior.

The CalMatters infographic isn't up to their usual standards.
Ignoring the non-neutral phrasing like "gun show loophole", it's just not accurate. In spite of the claim, in 1991, not all firearms sales were required to go through an FFL because the antique language was still part of the code, which allowed 50+ year old firearms to be PPT'd without dros/ffl.
 
Contrast with my out of date page http://web.archive.org/web/20191018...p?title=Time_Line_of_California_Firearms_Laws

Sadly, there have been additions to the corpus of ridiculous laws since 2015, most notably 2016's Proposition 63 - the wiki page is a 'good enough' summary, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_California_Proposition_63. That was my 'I cannot stay in CA' moment. Moved to Oregon in 2019.

The Ballotpedia page is similar, with somewhat better lawsuit coverage, I think - https://ballotpedia.org/California_...Large-Capacity_Ammunition_Magazine_Ban_(2016)

Being text-oriented, as are wikis, it would never have occurred to me to attempt such a picture. I do think the context of the criminal occurrences stimulating the Legislature is a useful addition.
I would comment on this, as well as the "Cal Matters" page you shared. However, not sure if this would fall under political commentary here in this new forum? Nonetheless, I appreciate these types of information threads, and hope to see more here.
 
Back
Top Bottom