18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

MCX Regulator with pistol grip - not AW

Walmart_AR15

Active member
Messages
84
Just saw a pic of MCX Reg with a m500 pistol grip stock. So if u look at it closely, the web of the thumb is above the trigger, which by CA DOJ definition it’s not a pistol grip. So the configuration would still be featureless.

Won’t pay the MSRP Regulator just for this, but for those who owns one from the recent sale, maybe a possibility.

Sorry cannot attach photo (wrong format, and can’t read what’s allowed, blocked by file name) but search for “Sig MCX Regulator Configuration Options”
 
This is a pistol grip:

The test for pistol grip is not "IF" some of the web of the thumb can be above the magic line, but is actually 'IF" some of the web of the thumb can get below the magic line.
Therefore, the grip design needs to be such as to not allow ANY of the web of the thumb to ever go below the line in order for a grip that protrudes conspicuously below the action to NOT legally be a pistol grip.

This is not a pistol grip because the grip does not protrude conspicuously below the action:
 
Last edited:
Just saw a pic of MCX Reg with a m500 pistol grip stock. So if u look at it closely, the web of the thumb is above the trigger, which by CA DOJ definition it’s not a pistol grip. So the configuration would still be featureless.

Won’t pay the MSRP Regulator just for this, but for those who owns one from the recent sale, maybe a possibility.

Sorry cannot attach photo (wrong format, and can’t read what’s allowed, blocked by file name) but search for “Sig MCX Regulator Configuration Options”
Bad deductive reasoning. That most certainly is a "Pistol Grip."
 
what's the point? just buy a mcx virtus or mcx spear... don't try and make your ranch rifle an AR.... its not the same....
Because it is not the same is the answer. I could see someone getting this set up to feel/ handle more like your Mesa Tactical, etc equipped shotgun.

Plus, it does give a lot of different non-AR specific options like the adapter plugs (in place of buffer tube) to run non-AR style folding stocks.

Sometimes AR abilities in a non-AR platform make more sense for the end user and their specific usage or end goal.
 
Because it is not the same is the answer. I could see someone getting this set up to feel/ handle more like your Mesa Tactical, etc equipped shotgun.

Plus, it does give a lot of different non-AR specific options like the adapter plugs (in place of buffer tube) to run non-AR style folding stocks.

Sometimes AR abilities in a non-AR platform make more sense for the end user and their specific usage or end goal.
not really ....
 
not really ....
Then it's a stalemate that comes down to opinions. But I'll give an example of why someone might rather have a rifle/shotgun style stock:

My back is trashed, it took surgeries to put me back together again. It is more comfortable for me to hold up my Fightlite "shotgun" style stock than an AR15. And it's not just the weight, same goes for shotguns of comparable weight with the different stocks. The standard shotgun style stock shotgun is easier on my back then a pistol grip stock shotgun.

I may like pistol grip stock shotguns more, And I definitely have more real world use and training with the M16/M4 and AR15 pattern rifles, but my health condition makes a standard rifle stock more comfortable in the ready position over extended periods of time.
 
Back
Top Bottom