18+ Content Warning

By clicking Enter, you confirm you are 18 years of age or older and agree to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws.

Notice: Any content or member activity - including anything you may buy, sell, transfer, or discuss - must comply with current and upcoming laws.

Members are encouraged to stay informed: California Firearm Laws: 2026 Outlook & 2025 Recap . Responsibility for compliance rests solely with the individual member.

caguns.net

Welcome to CAguns.net!
Join our growing community where you can ask questions, share knowledge, or browse our classifieds section.

Sign up for a free account today and unlock full access! Once registered, you can search, post, and take advantage of exclusive features unavailable to guests.

A note on why more of the site now requires an account: automated scrapers and AI systems have been crawling our forums and classifieds at a scale. Requiring sign-in for those sections is the most effective tool we have. It takes a minute to register, it's free, and it keeps what happens here between actual members.

New to California gun ownership or trying to keep up with the changing laws? Check out our sister site CA2A.com — free courses, plain-English legal updates, and step-by-step guides built for California owners.

Advanced features are available only to registered members. Register today!

🚨 CASE UPDATE: VALLEJOS v. ROB BONTA & CHAD BIANCO 🚨

CheekyFella

⚠️ New Member | No Deposits ☢️
Messages
2
Hey everyone, I wanted to give a big update on my federal case out of Riverside, California: VALLEJOS v. ROB BONTA & CHAD BIANCO.

I filed this lawsuit pro se (on my own, without an attorney) because California’s current CCW scheme is unconstitutional, profit-driven, and actively stripping law-abiding citizens of their rights.


---

⚖️ Where We’re At

I filed for a preliminary injunction to stop California’s CCW scheme in Riverside. The court denied it.

On August 27, 2025, I filed a Notice of Appeal to keep this case moving forward in the Ninth Circuit.

This means the fight is far from over. It’s just now stepping into a bigger courtroom where precedent truly matters.



---

🔑 Why This Case Matters

After the Supreme Court’s Bruen ruling struck down “good cause,” California swapped it for “good moral character” screening—an equally unconstitutional, subjective barrier.

On top of that, they stacked training mandates and state fees, turning your right into a paid subscription model.

I’m a Federal Firearms Licensee (FFL). I hold an Arizona CCW. I even have a letter from the California DOJ confirming I’m not a prohibited person.
👉 Yet Riverside Sheriff Chad Bianco denied me anyway under these “good moral character” hurdles.


This case isn’t about politics. It’s not Red vs. Blue. It’s the State vs. YOU.


---

💰 Follow the Money

Here’s why the State is fighting so hard to keep this system alive:

CCW instructors routinely charge $275 per seat.

25 students = $6,875 per class.

Just one class per week = $357,500 per year.

Over ten years = $3.5 MILLION—from one instructor.


Now multiply that across California. We’re talking tens of millions—possibly more—flowing into a system that exists only because the State insists you must “pay to play” for an inalienable right.


---

📢 What You Can Do (Peacefully & Lawfully)

1. Spread awareness. Share this case in every 2A and legal forum you can. Most people don’t even know it exists.


2. Engage locally. File CPRA requests (California’s version of FOIA) for denial rates, fee ledgers, and instructor rosters in your county. This data exposes the racket.


3. Push back politically. Contact your reps and demand they eliminate subjective standards and excessive fees.


4. Support grassroots action. Don’t wait for big orgs. They’ve ignored this fight. It’s on us to bring the light.




---

💡 Bottom Line

I’m not a millionaire. I’m not backed by CRPA, NRA, or any big machine. I’m just a regular citizen who decided to take this fight to federal court.

My case proves the truth: California’s CCW scheme is unconstitutional on its face and as applied.

It violates Bruen.

It violates Heller.

It violates McDonald.

And it violates the principle that rights are not for sale.


When government turns liberty into a privilege you have to buy, resistance becomes duty.


---

👉 If you’re tired of watching your rights get auctioned off to the highest bidder, stand with me. Amplify this case. Share the facts. And most importantly—don’t buy into the idea that rights are “permissions” from the State.

VALLEJOS v. BONTA & BIANCO is proof that one person can push back. But I can’t do it alone.
 
The appeal I wrote and the letter from the doj stating I am not disqualified or prohibited. Yet I will still denied by Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco CCW Unit based on arbitrary rules and subjective standards against the Bruen decision and SCOTUS RULINGS.
 

Attachments

  • 1000011749.png
    1000011749.png
    61.6 KB · Views: 7
  • 1000011908.png
    1000011908.png
    27.8 KB · Views: 6
Back
Top Bottom